AUKUS: Why does Australia keep spending billions of dollars not buying submarines.

Professor Jackson from The University of Winpega ​Mathematics and Common Sense Faculty has crunched the numbers on the AUKUS deal.

He has made a startling and yet seemingly blindly obvious finding: The AUKUS Submarine deal is a dud.

'This deal is a dud' said Professor Jackson. 'This is the most expensive dud in the history of Australia. We're building subs that could be disabled and damaged with a couple of $20,000 drones. The subs would then take years of repairs and parts to come from ... USA'.

'Warfare has moved on .... the purchasing department of the Australian Military writing out paper purchase orders has not. Sack the lot of them! said Prof Jackson.

'The only people benefiting from this stupid $368 billion dollar spend are companies like Lockhead Martin, and people like Jared Kushner, Donald Trump and all the other billionaire snouts in the trough'.

'What a tru blue, unfair shake of the sauce bottle, waste of Australia taxpayer dollars'. 

"We are shipping billions of dollars to the USA so they can think about starting to build facilities that might build Australia a submarine in 30 years. In comparison, Iran and Ukraine have disabled opponents with $20,000 drones: blowing up ships, oil production facilities and sucking $26 billion of the US Military Budget in just 3 weeks but using $2 million dollar patriot missiles to blow up $20,000 drones.'

'Australia seemingly has a rich history of spending lots of money not buying subs' said Prof Jackson. We spent $6 billion not buying subs from France, and will now spend $368 billion taxpayer dollars to not buy subs from the USA. We just keep spending billions of dollars not buying submarines.